A chilly September morning in 2023 began with an unusual disturbance on the access road leading to Birch River One stop.

Three unmarked police vehicles quietly pulled up in front of the small convenience store that was familiar to locals here.

A few passing motorists glanced through their car windows as officers and tactical gear dispersed, positioning themselves around the area with a precision that silenced the parking lot as if it had been flash frozen in an instant.

Behind the glass doors, Raymer Cobb, 62 years old, was preparing to stir his morning coffee, a habit he had maintained for over a decade while living a reclusive life in a cabin near Summersville Lake, avoiding all social connections.

The sound of hurried footsteps rang out at 6:40 a.m.

when an officer knocked hard on the door frame.

Raymer Cobb, Nicholas County Sheriff’s Office.

We have a warrant for your arrest in connection with the disappearance at Summersville Lake in 2010.

The officers later described how Cobb’s hand trembled slightly as he set down his coffee cup, but his gaze remained unnaturally calm, as if he had known or had been waiting for this moment for the past 13 years.

Before diving deeper into the story, don’t forget to subscribe to the channel and hit the notification bell so you don’t miss the latest cases.

Summersville, West Virginia, is located in the hilly eastern part of the state where rocky slopes descend to the deep, clear waters of Summersville Lake, a large man-made reservoir that often attracts anglers, divers, and seasonal tourists.

The area around the lake is mostly forested with trails leading to the Longpoint trail head, cutting through steep terrain and high rock outcroppings overlooking the dark water at night.

In this small community, six teenagers, Caleb Rowan, Jesse Hart, Logan Pierce, Evan Dodson, Travis Cole, and Mason Grady, grew up together, familiar with every curve of the road circling the lake, and often gathering at campsites or short-term rental cabins during holidays.

On the evening of March 19th, 2010, the group gathered at a spring break party held near the Longpoint Trail Head area, where several dozen young people came together, played music, built small bonfires, and moved in and out of a cabin on the edge of the woods.

The evening stretched past midnight, and around 1:00 a.m., the group of six left the cabin area, heading along the trail toward the parking lot before splitting into two smaller groups.

As they walked down the dirt road, connecting Long Point to the main route near the lake.

Between 1:00 and 1:15 a.m., several party attendees saw them heading south toward the area leading to both Summersville Lake Marina and Battlerun Boat Launch.

After that point, no one at the party saw the group again.

A little over half an hour later, security cameras at Birch River One stop, a small rest stop along Route 19, captured images of three of the six teenagers appearing at 1:48 a.m.

Passing through the front lobby area before exiting the frame toward the parking lot.

No further movement related to the group was recorded on the area’s camera system at that time.

By the morning of March 20th, as each family realized none of the six teenagers had returned home after the previous night’s party, anxiety quickly turned to panic.

They called each other to compare information, contacted their children’s friends, checked the cabins, boat ramps, and familiar spots around the lake, but only received unanswered calls and unread messages.

As hours passed without any sign of where the group might have gone, the family’s independent searches reached a dead end.

Realizing this was no longer a typical delay, the families agreed to contact local authorities.

And at 9:15 a.m., an official report of the six missing teenagers was submitted to the Nicholas County Sheriff’s Office.

As soon as the information was received, the onduty unit quickly recognized the unusual nature of the case.

Six teenagers vanishing at the same time, leaving no trace of communication, not appearing at home, part-time jobs, or any familiar locations.

This initial assessment caused the case to be immediately escalated in priority and triggered the emergency missing person’s protocol.

The first step in the protocol was to collect and organize all basic identification information for each teenager, including height, weight, hair color, last seen clothing, distinguishing features, usual footwear, and any personal items that could aid identification during the search.

Police contacted each parent directly to verify the exact time their child left home the previous day along with the schedule the teens had shared with their families before attending the party.

Several parents confirmed their children left home between 6:00 and 700 p.m.

saying they were going to a spring break gathering near the Longpoint trail head area and mentioned no plans to go elsewhere after the party.

Verifying the teenagers daytime activities on March 19th showed all six had normal routines.

Some worked short shifts at grocery stores while others stayed home or played sports with friends.

There were no indications that any of them intended to leave town.

After this initial verification, police compiled a list of party attendees based on statements from friends, text messages, and confirmations from other parents.

The list quickly grew to more than 30 names, mostly local high school students and a few young adults from nearby towns.

Police focused on identifying those who last saw the group of six at the party.

One group of friends confirmed seeing them leave the cabin between 1:00 and 1:15 a.m.

Another said the group split into two right after stepping out of the cabinard.

Three walking ahead quickly, the remaining three lagging behind.

Police noted this detail because it matched the footage of three teenagers appearing on the Birch River One-stop camera.

Later, when reviewing transportation information, families reported that the six teenagers did not arrive in a single vehicle.

Two were dropped off by parents early in the evening, but said they would find their own ride home.

Two rode together in a small pickup truck driven by Mason Grady, and the other two were dropped off at the trail head by a friend from town before joining the group.

None had informed their families of any plan to leave the cabin area for another location that night.

Police recorded all this information to determine whether the group used vehicles to leave the party or walked down to lakeside areas.

Collecting information also included checking personal vehicles.

Mason Grady’s pickup truck was found in the parking lot near Longpoint Trail Head, locked from the outside but with no keys inside.

This detail aligned with statements that they left the cabin on foot rather than by vehicle.

Police also confirmed no additional vehicles belonging to the group were recorded at the marina or battlerun boat launch, temporarily ruling out the possibility they drove down to the boat ramps.

Concurrent with gathering information, police began creating official missing person’s files for all six teenagers.

Each file included personal details, time left home, time left the party, camera footage data, verified timelines, lists of related witnesses, and notes on special factors such as the group splitting up before losing contact.

The files also noted the phone status of each teenager, all six devices stopped responding from early morning, even though, according to families, most were fully charged before leaving home.

The complete lack of any signal or interaction from these devices for hours led police to assess the urgency of the case as significantly higher than typical single missing person’s incidents.

That morning, internal reports were completed quickly and an initial alert was issued countywide to gather additional information from the public if anyone had seen the group during the night or early morning.

This foundational data set became the basis for the next phase of the investigation, particularly reconstructing the last known locations and times the six teenagers were seen before disappearing from their usual patterns of movement.

Based on that foundation, police began constructing a preliminary timeline that same afternoon of March 20th by returning to the spring break party site and interviewing everyone who had been present the night before.

Witnesses were divided into three groups.

Those who left early, those who stayed until the end, and those who had direct interaction with the six teenagers.

Each person was asked to describe their arrival time, when they saw the group moving between the cabin, bonfire area, and trail section, and when they themselves left the party.

The collected data quickly showed the party activity started around 900 p.m.

with guests arriving sporadically.

The investigative team’s goal was to reconstruct the timeline specifically related to the six teenagers.

Statements aligned on several points.

The full group was seen near the cabin around 10 p.m.

engaging in normal activities like talking, taking photos, and moving between the cabin interior and the backyard area.

From 11:00 p.m.

to nearly 1:00 a.m., accounts began to diverge.

One witness claimed to have spoken with Mason Grady around 12:20 a.m.

Another said they saw Caleb and Jesse walking toward the forest edge at 12:40 a.m.

without knowing where they were going.

Another statement noted Logan and Evan stepping away from the group a couple of times, but always returning to the cabin after a few minutes.

Police noted that the overlap of some information allowed them to establish a general activity timeline from 900 p.m.

to 1:00 a.m.

But the group’s free movement within the cabin and backyard made exact timestamps difficult to pinpoint absolutely.

The critical point was the departure time from the party, which multiple witnesses recalled, but not consistently.

About onethird remembered the six teenagers leaving the cabin around 1:00 a.m.

while others described it closer to 1:15 a.m.

One person described seeing Travis close the cabin door at exactly 10:07 a.m.

after checking their phone clock.

However, since this was a single statement, police recorded it only as reference information.

When combining the statements into a timeline, police determined that 1:00 1:15 a.m.

was the most reasonable window for the group leaving the party.

This was considered the last confirmed point.

The group was present at a location with direct witnesses.

Cross-referencing this with existing case file data revealed a large gap in the movement chain from leaving the party to the camera at Birch River.

One stop capturing three teenagers at 1:48 a.m.

was more than 30 minutes with no recordings whatsoever.

This time period was marked by police as an unaccounted for time block significant because it was the segment when the group was completely outside the observation of both witnesses and family.

From here, verifying activities during this period became the top priority for the investigative team.

Police noted the need to cross-check the 1:00 11:15 window with the geographic locations between the cabin and the gas station to estimate walking or vehicular travel time, identify points where the group might have stopped along the way, and review potential camera locations that could help narrow the time gap.

These initial analyses were fed directly into the preliminary timeline, creating the foundation for a more accurate reconstruction of events leading up to the group appearing at Birch River One stop.

To address the need to solidify that time gap, police proceeded to the next step by obtaining all camera footage from Birch River One stop, where three teenagers were recorded at 1:48 a.m.

Video was extracted from both the exterior lobby camera overlooking the parking lot and the interior entrance camera to gather data on approach direction, movement speed, and departure direction of the three individuals.

The store interior footage only showed them passing by the front glass without entering so police focused analysis on the exterior lobby segment where group movement could be observed more clearly.

The exterior camera displayed the front parking area of the gas station and the segment of road connecting to US19.

The footage showed the three teenagers appearing from the east side of the parking lot based on the direction they entered the frame and the position of oncoming vehicle headlights.

After passing the glass doors, all three continued moving diagonally across the front of the parking lot before disappearing on the side bordering US19.

Police marked this movement direction and questioned whether the remaining three teenagers followed a similar route or had split off earlier.

They compared the camera appearance time with the distance from Longpoint Trail Head to Birch River One stop.

Walking between the two locations in 30 35 minutes was deemed reasonable given the gap from 115 to 148, making walking via forest trails or lakeside shortcuts a possibility worth considering.

However, to confirm the direction after leaving the gas station, police had to check additional cameras along US19.

Since in 2010, traffic camera systems in West Virginia were not widespread, available camera points were very limited, most roadside businesses only had cameras facing inward rather than outward.

Police reviewed potential cameras at other rest stops, but only obtained lowresolution footage from a store a few miles away.

Although video quality was insufficient to clearly identify individuals, the timestamp and movement data showed no large group of pedestrians crossing the area between 1:45 and 2:10 a.m., leading to the conclusion that if the group continued moving, they most likely took a route away from the main highway and outside public camera coverage.

To reinforce the movement direction, police analyzed terrain features.

Birch River One stop is located north of Summersville Lake and from the parking lot, there were two main directions to return toward the lake area.

An unlit dirt road leading back to the forest edge bordering Longpoint Trail or a secondary route running along Lakeside Trails a few hundred meters from the lot.

Given that the group had no vehicle at the gas station, police ruled out the possibility they left via US19 to another town without calling anyone or stopping elsewhere.

They assessed the most likely direction as the group leaving the station and heading back down toward the lake via trails or forest roads.

To verify, police used topographic maps to identify intersections between lakeside trails and small roads connecting to US19.

Many of these had no cameras, no lighting, and were quiet enough for three people to pass through without being recorded by any device.

The conclusion from the camera analysis was the three teenagers captured at Birch River one stop, arrived from the east side of the parking lot, and departed toward the north side of the route leading down to the lake area.

This aligned with the assumption that they were moving around Summersville Lake rather than leaving the party vicinity entirely.

From this basis, police narrowed the initial investigation scope to areas adjacent to the lake, including two key points, Summersville Lake Marina and Battlerun Boat Launch.

These were considered the highest probability locations the group headed to after leaving the gas station as both were within a reasonable walking radius and fit the confirmed time trajectory in the video.

Concurrent with this assessment, police created a preliminary crime scene map encompassing the entire route from Longpoint Trail Head to Birch River One stop and extending down to the two relevant boat ramps.

Establishing the corridor of movement, the group’s travel corridor from 1:48 a.m.

onward gave investigators a basis to deploy targeted field surveys in lakeside areas, focusing on the possibility that the three teenagers continued toward the water after leaving the gas station.

From that movement corridor, the next step for investigators was to precisely identify locations the group might have reached after 1:48 a.m.

Based on Birch River one-stop camera data showing movement direction matching the route back north toward Summersville Lake, police used detailed topographic maps around the lake to review trails, side paths connecting to US19, waterfront areas, and boat ramps active at night.

When cross-referencing the time gap from 1:48 to around 2:00 a.m.

with walking distance from the gas station to the lake, two locations stood out most prominently, Summersville Lake Marina and Battlerun Boat launch.

Both were situated lower than the main highway and had feasible pedestrian access from the gas station side.

Summersville Lake Marina is the largest boating port in the area with wooden dock systems, boat moing stations, and access areas for commercial and recreational activities.

The marina has limited nighttime lighting, but enough for groups of young people to occasionally gather on the edges where no staff are on duty overnight.

In contrast, Battlerun Boat Launch is a few miles from the marina, but more easily accessible via forest paths, and usually deserted after midnight.

This spot has a sloped ramp down to the water, areas for small boats and pedal boats, and less obstructed terrain, matching witness descriptions of hearing engine noise.

around 2:30 a.m.

Police evaluated each location against three criteria.

Access time from the gas station, feasibility of walking there, and likelihood the group could enter the boat ramp area unnoticed.

Both the marina and battle run met the criteria.

But based on fragments from camera footage and witness statements, the investigative team designated these two ramps as primary survey targets for the next phase.

After selecting the two sites, police planned field surveys in priority order.

The marina was chosen for initial survey because it was closer to the gas station and offered a chance the group arrived earlier within the time gap.

Battle Run would be the second survey point, focusing on low light, low supervision areas where strangers could move freely at night.

For effective implementation, the sheriff’s office divided personnel into two teams, a field team and an analysis team.

The field team was assigned to approach each boat ramp to record any suspicious traces, footprints, skid marks, drag marks, or any disturbed objects while equipped with full measuring tools, high-powered lights, scene photography equipment, and tools for collecting mud and water samples for analysis.

Meanwhile, the analysis team was tasked with cross-referencing all collected data with the established timeline, creating detailed maps of areas needing expanded surveys, and identifying points most likely directly related to the movement corridor from Birch River One stop down to the lake.

The survey plan clearly defined the inspection scope at each location for Summersville Lake Marina, the entire main dock area, wooden pier rows, mooring zones, and pedestrian paths down to the water’s edge.

For battlerun boat launch, the sloped ramp, lakeside trails, and ground areas where small boats are typically pulled up.

Establishing these two target points was strategic, allowing investigators to begin searching for traces along the assumed movement direction from the gas station down to waterfront areas.

From that plan, the Nicholas County Sheriff’s Office deployed the field team to Summersville Lake Marina in the early afternoon of March 20th, treating it as the first survey point because it was the closest to the direction of movement extracted from the Birch River one-stop camera.

Upon approaching the marina, the investigation team divided the area into three distinct sections.

The main dock where local residents mored their boats, the row of secondary docks right at the water’s edge, and the ramp area leading down to the wooden pier.

Their objective was to thoroughly search all possible access points that the group of six teenagers might have used between 1:15 a.m.

and 2:00 a.m.

The field team began with the secondary docks, which had minimal lighting and where small boats were often left mored overnight.

On the wooden pier surface, they discovered multiple overlapping footprints, some fresh, some older, but could not immediately determine which, if any, belonged to the teenagers as the area saw foot traffic in the evenings.

However, some footprints leading to the edge of the pier showed slight drag marks pointing downward toward the water.

The team documented the locations with scene photos and marked them with small stakes for later comparison.

Upon closer inspection, they observed faint streaks running along the planks, difficult to distinguish as light drag marks or just natural wear.

The investigators measured the distances between these marks, determining they were scattered and did not show clear signs of a boat or heavy object being dragged from the dock, but they were still recorded for comparison with data from Battle Run.

Later continuing the survey, the team checked the water’s edge conditions and the water level recorded on the morning of March 20th.

According to the DNR report provided on site, the water level remained stable overnight from March 19th into March 20th with no unusual changes due to dam release or heavy rain.

This was significant because it ruled out the possibility of rising or falling water erasing traces.

The team also noted the nighttime visibility based on the docks lighting system.

Only a few high-pressure sodium lights illuminated the main moing area, while the secondary docks and access to the water were almost completely dark after 11 p.m.