April 2023, the governor of California stood before cameras with an announcement that would shake the transportation industry to its core.

California had just become the first place anywhere in the world to mandate the complete end of diesel truck sales.

The timeline was set.

By 2036, no new diesel trucks could be sold anywhere in the state.

By 2045, every single truck rolling on California roads would be zero emission.

The governor’s office released statements calling this the most impactful step our state can take to fight climate change.

They projected$ 26 billion in health savings.

They promised fleet owners would save 48 billion from the transition to electric.

The trucking industry heard these numbers and said something very different.

They said it was impossible.

They said the technology did not exist.

They said the charging infrastructure was not there.

They said it would destroy businesses that had operated for generations.

California dismissed these concerns as fear-mongering.

Just wait and see, they said.

I’m Richard Lawson, and you’re watching Richard Lawson Extra.

Before we continue, I need you to understand something important.

This is the only official channel.

Many people are copying my content, my face, my style, but this is the original source.

If you value serious investigative reporting on global economics and geopolitics, subscribe to Richard Lawson Extra right now.

Hit that like button, leave a comment with your thoughts, and share this video because what I’m about to reveal affects every single American whether you drive a truck or not.

21 months after that press conference on January 13, 2025, California did something extraordinary.

They quietly withdrew the entire regulation.

There was no press conference this time, no explanation to the media, just a letter sent to the Environmental Protection Agency pulling the waiver request that would have allowed enforcement of these rules.

7 days later, a new president was sworn into office.

The official explanation from California was simple.

Uncertainty presented by the incoming administration, but that explanation raises more questions than it answers.

The regulation had been pending with the EPA for 14 months under an administration that actively supported California’s environmental goals.

That same administration approved six other California emission waiverss in its final weeks in power.

This one never got approved.

17 states had filed lawsuits to block it.

The California Trucking Association had sued.

Multiple industry groups had sued.

and the EPA under what should have been a friendly administration still could not find a way to approve it.

So the question we need to ask is not why California withdrew the mandate.

The question is what happened to the trucking companies that spent two years preparing for a mandate that was never going to work.

To understand how California arrived at this moment, we have to go back to September 2020.

That’s when the governor signed Executive Order N7920.

This order directed the California Air Resources Board to develop regulations requiring all new trucks sold in California to be zero emission by 2045.

It was positioned as the governor’s most ambitious plan to transform the transportation sector.

The California Air Resources Board spent two years developing what became known as Advanced Clean Fleets.

The regulation was officially approved in April 2023.

It affected 1.8 million trucks operating across the state.

This included delivery vehicles operated by major companies like FedEx, UPS, and Amazon.

The rules themselves were complicated with multiple tiers and timelines, but the core requirement was brutally simple.

Starting January 1st, 2024, certain fleets would be required to begin transitioning to zero emission vehicles.

Dreage trucks that serve the ports would face the strictest timelines.

Large fleets operating 50 or more trucks would follow soon after.

And by 2036, no manufacturer could legally sell a new diesel truck anywhere in California.

The trucking industry immediately raised alarms.

Not because they opposed cleaner air, but because the basic math did not work.

Electric trucks cost two to three times more than diesel equivalents.

A single electric semitr can cost over $500,000.

Now consider this fact.

96% of trucking companies in America operate 10 or fewer trucks.

For a small operator, that is not a transition cost.

That is bankruptcy.

The American Trucking Associations calculated what full electrification would actually require.

$1 trillion.

And that’s not even counting the cost of purchasing the trucks themselves.

That one trillion is just for infrastructure, charging stations, grid upgrades, power generation capacity, $1 trillion before you convert a single truck.

But the cost was only part of the problem.

The infrastructure simply did not exist.

Charging stations designed for passenger cars cannot handle the power requirements of semi-truckss.

The few stations that could were located in shopping center parking lots where a truck pulling a 53- ft trailer physically could not fit.

Drivers would have to unhitch their trailers, charge the truck alone, and then return to reattach the trailer.

That is not operational efficiency.

That is a logistics nightmare.

That makes no economic sense.

And if two trucks tried to draw electricity from the same station at once, the batteries would charge even more slowly.

If a truck ran out of charge on the highway, it could cost $600 just for a 10 mile tow.

One fleet operator decided to make it work.

They bought 14 electric trucks from Nickeola to run alongside their existing diesel fleet.

They wanted to be early adopters.

They wanted to comply.

The manufacturer recalled all 14 trucks because of fire risk.

Those trucks sat completely unusable for months while waiting for battery replacements.

The company had paid full price for electric trucks and received zero miles of service in return.

Then there was the weight problem that nobody wanted to discuss publicly.

The batteries that power electric trucks are incredibly heavy.

So heavy that truckers would be forced to haul lighter loads just to stay under federal weight limits.

Fewer goods per trip means you need more trips.

More trips means more trucks on the road.

The regulation designed to reduce emissions could actually increase the total number of trucks and traffic congestion.

The trucking industry presented all of this data to the California Air Resources Board.

They showed the costs.

They showed the infrastructure gaps.

They showed the technology limitations.

The California Air Resources Board approved the regulation anyway.

But California had a significant legal problem.

Under the Clean Air Act, California cannot enforce emission standards that are stricter than federal rules without receiving a waiver from the EPA.

California submitted its waiver request in November 2023, expecting quick approval.

That approval never came.

What happened next revealed how California intended to force compliance even without federal permission.

In late December 2023, just days before the regulation was supposed to take effect, the California Air Resources Board issued an enforcement notice.

The notice said the board would not enforce the regulation until the EPA granted the necessary waiver.

On the surface, that sounds reasonable, but you have to read the fine print carefully.

The notice said the board reserved all of its rights to enforce the advanced clean fleet regulations in full for any period for which a waiver is granted.

Then it got very specific.

Once the waiver is granted or determined to be unnecessary, fleets may need to remove any vehicle from the California fleet that was not eligible to be added to the California fleet after January 1st, 2024.

Read that language again carefully.

remove any vehicle.

The California Air Resources Board was telling trucking companies that if they bought a diesel truck after January 1st, 2024, and the EPA later approved the waiver, California could force them to remove that truck from service, not sell it out of state, remove it entirely.

This created an impossible choice for every trucking company operating in California.

Trucking companies need to replace aging vehicles.

That is normal business operations.

But buying a diesel truck now meant risking that California would later force you to scrap it completely.

And buying an electric truck meant spending three times as much on technology that might not work for your specific routes and operational needs.

Some companies pre-ordered diesel trucks in late 2023, trying to beat the deadline.

They placed orders for vehicles they did not actually need yet just to lock in the ability to buy them before the rules changed.

That was not efficient capital allocation.

That was panic buying driven by regulatory threats.

Other companies froze their purchasing entirely.

Trucks that should have been replaced based on normal maintenance schedules kept running.

Maintenance costs went up.

Reliability went down.

But at least they were not risking a six-f figureure asset on California’s regulatory experiments.

Throughout all of 2024, fleets were technically free to buy whatever trucks they wanted, but the threat of retroactive enforcement had exactly the same effect as if the mandate was in full force.

Companies made business decisions that did not make business sense just to avoid the regulatory risk.

One fleet operator tested an electric truck at their facility.

It could not complete a single work shift without the battery dying.

When they reported this problem to regulators, they were told the technology would improve over time.

When they asked what they should do in the meantime, they were told to figure it out themselves.

Another operator calculated that to maintain their current delivery capacity with electric trucks, they would need to purchase 50% more vehicles.

More trucks means more drivers, more insurance, more maintenance, more parking space.

The supposed savings that California promised from electric vehicles would be completely buried under massive operational cost increases.

One trucking executive put it bluntly to the press.

These mandates are a reason so many truck companies are closing and going out of business.

It is getting next to impossible to run a freight business in the state of California.

This was not a theoretical concern being raised by industry lobbyists.

This was regulatory uncertainty being weaponized against an entire sector.

And California was not just regulating California trucking.

Under the Clean Air Act, other states are allowed to adopt California’s emission standards once they receive EPA approval.

More than a dozen states had already indicated they would follow California’s lead on this, including Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Washington, and Vermont.

If California’s regulation stood, all of these states would adopt identical rules.

That is not just California’s market being affected.

That is roughly 22% of the entire national truck market being dictated by unelected regulators in Sacramento.

And the problem gets much worse when you consider logistics.

70% of goods consumed anywhere in America touch California at some point in the supply chain.

The ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach together handle more than a third of all containerized imports to the United States.

Everything from electronics to clothing to food passes through these port facilities.

If California bans diesel trucks at its ports, it effectively bans them from the national supply chain.

A trucking company based in Nebraska that occasionally hauls freight to California would be forced to follow California’s rules, even though that company is based 2,000 miles away.

This is exactly what prompted 17 states to file a lawsuit.

In May 2024, Nebraska led a coalition of Republican le states challenging the regulation in federal court.

The lawsuit argued that California was attempting to dictate national trucking policy from Sacramento.

The plaintiffs called it economic warfare.

Lawsuits came from every direction.

The California Trucking Association filed its own lawsuit in October 2023.

The Western States Trucking Association sued separately.

The Specialty Equipment Market Association sued.

The American Free Enterprise Chamber of Commerce sued.

Legal challenges were coming from every possible angle.

And while these lawsuits worked their way slowly through the court system, trucking companies remained completely paralyzed.

They could not plan for the future.

They could not make investments.

They could not operate with any certainty about what rules would apply next year or the year after.

This is the type of economic damage that does not show up in official reports.

One company delayed a planned expansion because they did not know if their new trucks would even be legal.

A family business sold early because the owners could not afford the regulatory risk anymore.

A veteran driver left the industry entirely because the uncertainty was not worth the stress.

California created chaos across an entire industry.

And then when that chaos became completely undeniable, they simply walked away.

The January 2025 withdrawal was not California admitting the policy was fundamentally wrong.

The California Air Resources Board Chair, Leanne Randolph, said the agency was assessing its options to continue its progress towards zero emission goals.

The governor’s office put out statements saying they remained committed to those environmental objectives.

But the withdrawal was an admission of something else entirely.

After 14 months, the EPA under a supportive administration still had not approved the waiver.

24 Republican state attorneys general had urged the EPA to deny it outright.

The legal challenges were mounting on multiple fronts.

The technology still was not ready for widespread deployment.

California could see exactly what was coming next.

A new presidential administration openly hostile to the regulation.

an EPA that would almost certainly deny the waiver request.

A legal battle that California would very likely lose in federal court.

So, they withdrew the request, not because they admitted the policy failed, but because they did not want to be officially told the policy failed.

The American Trucking Associations called it a monumental victory for the industry.

Their president said that the trucking industry and American consumers can breathe a collective sigh of relief today after the California Air Resources Board finally bowed to reality.

But the story did not end there.

In May 2025, California agreed to formally repeal the regulation as part of a legal settlement with the states that had sued.

The settlement bars California from enforcing any part of the rule against private fleets.

The California Air Resources Board must propose formal repeal by October 2025 with final action required by August 2026.

The regulation that was supposed to transform trucking is being dismantled piece by piece and yet the damage is already done.

Trucking companies spent two full years operating under threat.

They made major investment decisions based on rules that ultimately never took effect.

They faced substantial legal costs fighting regulations that California ended up abandoning.

Some companies left the state entirely.

Some left the trucking industry altogether.

Some simply did not survive the uncertainty.

You cannot measure that damage in a single economic statistic.

It is spread across thousands of businesses making thousands of decisions under constant threat of punishment for guessing wrong.

This is how California regulates now.

Announce ambitious goals that sound impressive.

Threaten severe penalties for non-compliance.

Force compliance through uncertainty rather than actual enforcement.

And when the policy proves completely unworkable, quietly withdraw and claim you were just being cautious about the incoming administration.

The pattern is familiar if you have been paying attention.

the electric truck mandate, Assembly Bill Five, which devastated independent truckers across the state, the fast food minimum wage law that cost 18,000 jobs.

Each time we hear the same promise, this will help workers.

This will help the environment.

This will help California lead the nation.

Each time we see the same result, businesses flee the state, workers suffer the consequences, and California simply moves on to announce the next ambitious plan.

The governor of California has not publicly acknowledged what the advanced clean fleets debacle cost the trucking industry.

The official press releases still celebrate the regulation’s initial approval.

The promises of 26 billion in health savings are still posted online, but the regulation is dead.

killed not by political opposition but by its own fundamental impossibility.

1.8 million trucks were supposed to convert to electric power.

The charging infrastructure does not exist.

The electrical grid cannot handle the load.

The technology is not ready for this scale.

The cost would destroy small businesses across the state.

California knew all of this when they approved the regulation anyway.

They knew it when they threatened retroactive enforcement.

They knew it when they told trucking companies that diesel purchases might have to be removed from service.

They knew it when they created years of regulatory chaos.

And they knew it when they quietly withdrew the waiver request seven days before a new president took office, hoping most people would not notice.

When California announces the next ambitious environmental regulation, ask whether the technology actually exists.

Ask whether the infrastructure is really there.

ask whether small businesses can survive the transition costs.

And when California claims they are just responding to political uncertainty, remember they spent two years forcing an industry to operate under threat of a policy that was never going to work.

Subscribe to Richard Lawson Extra if you want more investigations like this.

Leave a comment with your thoughts on California’s regulatory approach.

Share this video so others understand what really happened.

The electric truck mandate collapsed.

But somewhere in Sacramento, regulators are already working on the next impossible mandate.

The only question is which industry gets to be the test subject next