A British scientist has sparked global debate by claiming the biblical Garden of Eden may have been located at Egypt’s Pyramids of Giza, challenging long-held beliefs and reigniting interest in ancient mysteries and the origins of humanity.

In a provocative new theory that has captured the imagination of historians, theologians, and science enthusiasts alike, a British scientist has made the extraordinary claim that the biblical Garden of Eden may have been located at the site of the Great Pyramids of Giza in Egypt.

This bold assertion challenges long-held assumptions about one of the most enduring stories in human history and has ignited a fierce debate among experts and believers around the world.

The theory, proposed by Matthew Sibson—a historian and researcher with a strong following on social media—suggests that the ancient biblical paradise described in the Book of Genesis may not have been in Mesopotamia, as traditionally believed, but rather beneath or near the iconic pyramids of Giza.

Sibson, best known for his YouTube channel where he explores historical mysteries and ancient architecture, claims to have uncovered geographical and textual clues that point to this new location for humanity’s mythical origin story.

According to Sibson, a close reading of biblical texts reveals descriptions of the Garden of Eden’s geography that align more closely with the landscape surrounding the Giza Plateau than the Tigris-Euphrates region typically associated with ancient Mesopotamia.

He points out the mention of four rivers in Genesis—the Pishon, Gihon, Tigris, and Euphrates—as key evidence.

While two of these rivers are historically tied to Mesopotamia, Sibson argues that ancient names and the shifting of river courses over millennia could account for the apparent discrepancy, and that the Nile and its ancient tributaries could also be contenders.

But perhaps the most compelling part of his argument is the alignment between the story of Eden and the monumental architecture of the pyramids.

Sibson speculates that the pyramids, far from being just tombs, may hold symbolic or literal ties to the Garden itself—possibly serving as markers, sacred structures, or even remnants of pre-flood civilization referenced in ancient texts.

He further suggests that the unique placement of the pyramids on the Giza Plateau, combined with their celestial alignments and mathematical precision, may not only reflect humanity’s fascination with the stars but also point toward a deeper spiritual or religious significance—one that predates traditional Egyptian cosmology and potentially ties back to the earliest spiritual narratives of mankind.

Critics, however, have been quick to challenge the theory. Archaeologists and biblical scholars argue that the overwhelming historical and archaeological consensus still places the Garden of Eden in the region of Mesopotamia, likely in present-day Iraq.

They point to ancient Sumerian and Akkadian texts that predate the Bible, which describe similar creation stories tied to the fertile crescent between the Tigris and Euphrates.

Moreover, Egyptologists contend that the Pyramids of Giza are well-documented tombs for the pharaohs Khufu, Khafre, and Menkaure, constructed during the Fourth Dynasty around 2600 BC—thousands of years after the timeline typically associated with Edenic narratives.

They caution against conflating mythological texts with archaeological evidence, warning that such theories, while intriguing, often lack scientific rigor and can blur the lines between entertainment and education.

Despite this skepticism, the public response to Sibson’s theory has been explosive. His videos exploring the idea have garnered millions of views, and online forums are teeming with debates about the plausibility of the claim.

Some viewers express amazement at the potential implications, while others urge caution, reminding followers to separate speculative theories from established history.

The renewed fascination with the Garden of Eden comes at a time when ancient mysteries are enjoying a renaissance in popular culture.

With the rise of streaming documentaries and podcasts focused on historical enigmas, the appetite for alternative theories and unconventional thinkers is stronger than ever.

Figures like Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson have gained significant followings for their alternative takes on early civilization, and Sibson’s theory fits squarely within that trend.

Interestingly, the Garden of Eden has long eluded precise identification. Though it is described as a real place in the Bible, complete with rivers and a specific location “eastward in Eden,” no archaeological evidence has definitively confirmed its existence.

Over the centuries, various locations have been proposed, including sites in Iran, Turkey, Iraq, and Armenia, among others. Sibson’s Giza theory adds a new and unexpected candidate to that list.

Whether or not his claim gains traction among academics, the theory has succeeded in reinvigorating public interest in the intersection of science, faith, and history.

It invites people to revisit ancient texts with fresh eyes and consider how geography, architecture, and mythology can intertwine in surprising ways.

For Sibson, the ultimate goal is not necessarily to prove a single definitive location for the Garden of Eden, but to open a broader conversation about how ancient knowledge has been interpreted—and perhaps misinterpreted—through time.

He believes that questioning mainstream historical narratives is a vital part of the human quest for truth, even if the answers remain elusive.

As discussions continue to unfold online and in academic circles, one thing is certain: the mystery of the Garden of Eden, whether myth or reality, still captivates the human imagination.

And if the pyramids of Giza truly hide secrets beyond what we know, they may not only be monuments to the dead—but gateways to the world’s most ancient legends.